A Case Study: Voluntariness of Admissions in Police Interview
Date: 01/09/2009
2819
The Name of the Offence
Burglary
Place of the event
Various
The court attended
Heidelberg Magistrates Court
Acting Solicitor: Shaun Pascoe
Facts of the Case
Client charged with 80 separate offences of burglary and theft at various locations. Client suffered from an intellectual disability. There was no forensic evidence linking our client to the offences. Apart from our client's disputed admissions during the police interview, there was no other evidence in support of the numerous charges. If found guilty, or if pleaded guilty, the likely sentence would have been in excess of 2 years.
Results Achieved
The voluntariness of our client's admissions during his interview was a critical issue in this case. We briefed a forensic psycholgist to provide an opinon as to the voluntariness of our client's admissions in circumstances where an independent third person was not present during our client's interview. Ultimately, all offences were withdrawn.
Our firm has extensive experience in representing clients charged with property offences. We critically review our client's briefs to determine the viability of any defence that may be available.