Offence

Begin Search

ADLA member for - TAS

Written by
Greg Barns
Criminal Defence Lawyer


Assaults / Violence Offences - TAS
Welcome to the TAS Resisting public officers: Resisting lawful apprehension article page. Everything you need to know about Resisting public officers: Resisting lawful apprehension according to TAS law - Dated: 09/01/2009

What the Law States according to TAS Law for Resisting public officers: Resisting lawful apprehension

According to TAS Law for the charge of Resisting public officers: Resisting lawful apprehension ,

>Criminal Code Act 1924  SECT 114

114. Resisting public officers: Resisting lawful apprehension

(1) Any person who assaults, resists, or wilfully obstructs any police officer in the execution of his duty, or any other person lawfully assisting him therein, is guilty of a crime.

Charge:Assaulting [or obstructing] a police officer.

(2) Any person who assaults, resists, or wilfully obstructs any person lawfully arresting or about to arrest any person is guilty of a crime.

Charge:Resisting lawful apprehension.

The Maximum Penalty - Resisting public officers: Resisting lawful apprehension

According to TAS Law for the charge of Resisting public officers: Resisting lawful apprehension ,

The maximum term of imprisonment is 21 years, or fine, or by both such punishments, and will be determined by the judge as he/she thinks fit in the circumstances of each particular case.

What the Police must prove according to TAS Law for Resisting public officers: Resisting lawful apprehension

(a) The accused assaulted, resisted or obstructed the police officer or any other person lawfully assisting him/her.

(b) The person assaulted etc was a member of the police force in the execution of his or her duty, or a person lawfully assisting the police member in the execution of his/her duty, or any person lawfully arresting or about to arrest any person

Possible Defences under TAS Law - Resisting public officers: Resisting lawful apprehension

(a) Duress

(b) Factual dispute

(c) Identification dispute

(d) Lack of intent

(e) Mental impairment

(f) Necessity

(g) Self-defence

(h) The officer was not acting in the execution of his/her duty

In TAS which court will hear the matter - Resisting public officers: Resisting lawful apprehension

Supreme Court

n/a